Posts Tagged ‘wimax’

Teletimes: Optimizing Mobile Carrier Backhaul-Ethernet Latency & Bandwidth Efficiency

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010
RSS Feed Subscribe to EtherNEWS Bookmark and Share

Teletimes published this Feature Article in their current edition: download original Teletimes backhaul article.

tele-article

Mobile Carrier Ethernet backhaul services from network operators, and the advent of packet based mobile systems, are predicted to provide mobile operators with scalable and more cost efficient solutions for handling both the increasing number of mobile devices attached to their networks and the traffic volumes they generate.

A major reason for the increased use of Carrier Ethernet in wireless backhaul applications is the ability to use a diverse physical infra­structure to deliver Carrier Ethernet to the base station. The physical delivery mecha­nisms for Carrier Ethernet include:

  • Ethernet over copper
  • Ethernet over fiber (both dark fiber and over SONET/SDH)
  • Ethernet over bonded copper
  • Ethernet over radio (microwave)
  • Ethernet over PON (Passive Optical Networks)

Low latency is the key to delivering reliable, high-performance backhaul for 3G and 4G wireless networks. Real-time communications, transactional applications, high-speed roaming, and media streaming are all delay-sensitive. Latency increases of just a few milliseconds can result in dropped calls, garbled voice and unresponsive applications, and can mean significant losses in financial trading.

At times, service providers over-provide bandwidth to keep latency and jitter in check. While increasing bandwidth can sometimes reduce latency, it often has little effect. In packet-based networks the relationship between latency and bandwidth is complex and varied. Consider the four main sources of latency, categorized as:

  • Serialization delay: time required for a port to transmit a packet, related to frame size and bit-rate;
  • Propagation delay: limita­tions imposed by the laws of physics (speed of light, path length, circuit design);
  • Congestion delay: the time a frame idles in the output queue of a network element (NE) while a backlog of packets is being transmitted. Congestion delay can be caused by traffic bursts, larger ingress vs. egress bandwidth (e.g. oversub­scribed aggregation), or due to network congestion resulting in paused trans­mission (flow control).
  • Forwarding delay: the time required for the Network Element (NE) to analyze, process and forward a packet in a congestion-free scenario; a function of NE architecture and packet-processing requirements (the number and complexity of operations performed on a packet between receipt and transmission, e.g. service mapping, switching, rate limiting, shaping, etc).

Of these components, serialization delay is the most constant, having only a small influence on end-to-end latency. Propagation delay, typically stable in circuit-switched networks, can be irregular and introduce jitter over routed networks due to path variation; overall, its contribution is usually small, even under heavy utilization.

Packet Delay Sources

Packet Delay Sources

The more important sources of latency – congestion and forwarding delay – are not entirely independent: as a NE is subject to heavy load (conges­tion delay), it may need additional queue time to handle and process the increased volume of traffic (forwarding delay). Depend­ing on the NE’s design, forwarding delay can be significant when advanced functions such as traffic shaping and multi-flow Ethernet OAM (Operations Administration & Mainte­nance) are enabled. (more…)


RSS Feed Subscribe to EtherNEWS Bookmark and Share

Wireless Financing MSO Wireless

Monday, February 8th, 2010
RSS Feed Subscribe to EtherNEWS Bookmark and Share

Cable Multi-Service Operators (MSOs) are in prime position in the bid to bring bandwidth to cell towers. With fiber passing through the most densely populated areas, building laterals to cell sites serving these regions is within ‘easy’ reach, at least as far as deploying fiber goes. With efficient Ethernet backhaul increasingly sited as a key pinch point and business case driver for profitable 3G & 4G (WiMAX / LTE) services, outsourcing backhaul to those able to build the infrastructure is an attractive option even for mobile incumbents with wireline businesses, like at&t and Verizon.

Still, MSOs need to justify the spend and the opportunity cost of delivering fiber to a cell site when opportunities abound in Ethernet business services to enterprises, and quadruple play needs have them planning their own wireless offerings: either with newly acquired spectrum (like Cox), or as a Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO). Good news is that sometimes the stars align, and it looks like the cable operators are starting to realize they can have their cake and eat it too, while talking on their new, subsidized wireless network.

Subsidized? Was there a wireless plan for MSOs buried somewhere in the broadband bailout? No luck. However, becoming a leader in wireless backhaul, business services and adding wireless to the bundle turns out to be self financing – at least for the latter two services. This is because as fiber gets built out deeper into metro regions for backhaul, bringing Carrier Ethernet to businesses gets easier as well. Having an access platform in the neighborhood can also provide service to enterprises, same capital spend.

And the operational expense for MSOs introducing their own wireless drops at the same time: stick an antenna on the tower already serving up bandwidth to mobile operators, and they’ll subsidize cable’s wireless expansion efforts. MVNO the model? MSOs can make a deal with their mobile partner – cheaper backhaul for cheaper pricing models.

It’s a win-win-win situation: build backhaul revenue, position for profitable wireless services, and establish a footprint for high-bandwidth Ethernet to the enterprise at the same time. If it sounds too good to be true, ask an MSO (if they can spare a minute, they’re very busy these days)!


RSS Feed Subscribe to EtherNEWS Bookmark and Share