<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>(Accedian Networks&#039;) EtherNEWS Blog &#187; latency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accedian.com/blog/tag/latency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog</link>
	<description>Packet Performance Assurance ™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:11:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Verizon Wireless API Will &#8220;Turbo&#8221; Sessions</title>
		<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/verizon-wireless-api-turbo-sessions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/verizon-wireless-api-turbo-sessions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gary.kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accedian.com/blog/?p=2366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Verizon will publish an application programming interface that could allow mobile consumers to &#8220;turbocharge&#8221; the network bandwidth their smartphone apps use, presumably for a small additional fee.
&#8220;I think one of the things that you could do is guaranteed quality of service,&#8221; said Hugh Fletcher, associate director for technology in Verizon&#8217;s Product Development and Technology team.

&#8220;One [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/verizon-wireless-api-turbo-sessions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LightSquared Use of Satellite for Backhaul Will Have Latency Implications</title>
		<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/lightsquared-satellite-backhaul-latency-implications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/lightsquared-satellite-backhaul-latency-implications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gary.kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accedian.com/blog/?p=2174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the issues I still don’t fully understand is the proposed reliance on satellite for backhaul by LightSquared, the proposed new Long Term Evolution service provider in the United States that hopes to use frequencies originally allocated for satellite communications.
LightSquared hopes to use the spectrum to create a national wholesale Long Term Evolution network.
But [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/lightsquared-satellite-backhaul-latency-implications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latency Advantages for 40/100GB Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/latency-advantages-40100gb-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/latency-advantages-40100gb-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gary.kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40/100 GB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accedian.com/blog/?p=2158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mid-2010 saw the introduction of the new 40/100GB networking standard, an obvious capacity increase, but the lower latency also is a key advantage, much as Long Term Evolution has better latency performance than third generation mobile air interfaces.
Compared to gigabit or 10 Gbps networks, network latency is less than two milliseconds, even over long network [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/latency-advantages-40100gb-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Users Frustrated by Mobile Video Experience</title>
		<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/mobile-users-frustrated-mobile-video-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/mobile-users-frustrated-mobile-video-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gary.kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accedian.com/blog/?p=1398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A survey of U.K. mobile users finds 96 percent are frustrated with their mobile video experience. In part, that likely reflects latency and bandwidth limitations that affect the quality of video content.

About 67 percent are discouraged by non-continuous video playback and the length of time it takes a video to begin playing, as well.

Of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/mobile-users-frustrated-mobile-video-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sources of Latency in Optical Systems Used by Financial Customers</title>
		<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog/opinion/sources-latency-optical-systems-financial-customers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accedian.com/blog/opinion/sources-latency-optical-systems-financial-customers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gary.kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low latency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accedian.com/blog/?p=1327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sources of Latency in Optical Systems Used by Financial Customers
Every optical-transport function that is intended to contribute to the successful beaming of traffic across fiber connections can inject small amounts of latency into the process. Today’s financial network manager must be cognizant of all of them.
Color conversion (“Transponding” and “muxponding” ) are two common sources [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accedian.com/blog/opinion/sources-latency-optical-systems-financial-customers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon Promises 30 mSec LTE Latency</title>
		<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/verizon-promises-30-msec-lte-latency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/verizon-promises-30-msec-lte-latency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gary.kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long term evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accedian.com/blog/?p=1268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Verizon Wireless users will experience latency of just 30 milliseconds when the new Long Term Evolution network is launched later this year. That will be quite helpful for users of real-time services including voice, video and cloud-based services.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/verizon-promises-30-msec-lte-latency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July EtherNEWS – Case Study: Performance Assurance for Mobile Backhaul Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog/ethernews/july-ethernews-case-study-performance-assurance-mobile-backhaul-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accedian.com/blog/ethernews/july-ethernews-case-study-performance-assurance-mobile-backhaul-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Accedian Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EtherNEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 ge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accedian Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gbe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gbps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gige]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metro Ethernet Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metronode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scalability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SureWest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[y.1731]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accedian.com/blog/?p=1228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


This Month&#8217;s Issue
Continually measuring the Key Performance Indicators (KPI&#8217;s) of the SLA&#8217;s being delivered in backhaul networks, is critical to the successful execution of the delivery of Ethernet mobile backhaul services. This month we&#8217;re excited to publish a case study of SureWest Communications experiences delivering their Wireless Carrier Backhaul Service to some of the top [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accedian.com/blog/ethernews/july-ethernews-case-study-performance-assurance-mobile-backhaul-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SureWest Communications Integrates Accedian Networks’ MetroNID® Performance Assurance Platform in its Wireless Carrier Backhaul Service</title>
		<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/surewest-communications-integrates-accedian-networks-metronid-performance-assurance-platform-wireless-carrier-backhaul-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/surewest-communications-integrates-accedian-networks-metronid-performance-assurance-platform-wireless-carrier-backhaul-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Accedian Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless backhaul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accedian.com/blog/?p=1212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SureWest Communications (NASDAQ: SURW) is deploying Accedian Network’s Performance Assurance Platform to ensure high quality service delivery for its Wireless Carrier Backhaul Ethernet-based mobile backhaul service.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/surewest-communications-integrates-accedian-networks-metronid-performance-assurance-platform-wireless-carrier-backhaul-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>June EtherNEWS &#8211;  Y.1731 Backhaul Monitoring Deployment Challenges</title>
		<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog/ethernews/april-ethernews-y1731-backhaul-monitoring-deployment-challenges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accedian.com/blog/ethernews/april-ethernews-y1731-backhaul-monitoring-deployment-challenges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Accedian Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EtherNEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 ge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gbe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gbps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gige]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metronode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scalability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[y.1731]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accedian.com/blog/?p=1148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

This Month&#8217;s Issue
Monitoring latency, jitter and availability is key in backhaul networks, but operators using Y.1731 to perform these measurements have run into
technical challenges with scalability and precision.  This month we draw on
Accedian Networks&#8217; First-hand experience working with leading carriers
during field trials and large scale backhaul network deployments.  The top
sticking points, lessons learned [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accedian.com/blog/ethernews/april-ethernews-y1731-backhaul-monitoring-deployment-challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LTE Latency Compared to HSPA</title>
		<link>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/lte-latency-compared-hspa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/lte-latency-compared-hspa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 12:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gary.kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lte]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accedian.com/blog/?p=1123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s another look at latency differences between the faster HSPA versions of  GSM and LTE.
The implications are that backhaul latency will have to improve as well, to match the local base station to handset latencies.
As always is the case, developers will use better network features to create applications that take advantage of those features.  That [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.accedian.com/blog/news/lte-latency-compared-hspa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

