Will Apple Be First to Make the Video Calling Breakthrough?
Lots of people will point out that person-to-person video calling appliances and features have been available for a while. Most of us would point to Skype, while others would point to the capabiltiies Nokia has been offering on its high-end phones, or the specialized video telephony products now on the market.
Apple’s new iPhone 4 “FaceTime” video calling feature might be notable, though. People will have different opinions about the ease of use for Skype video telephony, but the big snag for most consumer video telephony appliances has been the need to buy them in pairs.
The iPhone 4 might be the first “appliance” supporting video telephony that does not actually have to be “bought in pairs,” given the huge installed base the device is likely to have, globally. The other angle is that video telephony could become a “mere feature” of the most-widely-used communications appliance on the planet, though of course for the moment only on Apple iPhones from version 4 and forward.
Video calling might be a social function and therefore there is a network effect not possible when the units are deployed pair by pair.
Some significant sub-set of the mobile user population uses iPhones. In my own family, for example, all four of my children use iPhones, and it appears iPhone use among their peers is just about that high.
By confining FaceTime sessions to Wi-Fi connections, Apple avoids the almost-certain uneven quality of experience users would experience on AT&T’s 3G network.
Innovations sometimes, perhaps ever, solely or primarily dependent on development of new technology. More commonly, it is a combination of ease of use, user installed base, price and the face that lots of other people seem to be doing it. Up to this point, almost no users had to worry about “everybody else doing it.” That could change, beginning with the iPhone 4.
The bandwidth implications are clear enough. FaceTime only works when users are on a Wi-Fi (fixed line access) connection. That keeps the video bandwidth off the mobile network. Whether that stance can be maintained forever is questionable, though it also likely means service providers will be able to charge extra for the ability to use FaceTime on the mobile network.
Restricted to Wi-Fi, FaceTime is alot like Skype, a scheduled experience that does not represent unfettered, use it whenever you want communcations mobile text, texting and messaging represents. To make video telephony as natural as voice calling, FaceTime will have to be enabled for any-time mobile use.
Still, the direction is clear enough: The iPhone 4 supports high-definition video, pixel resolution that actually is higher than what the human eye can discriminate and is getting Netflix. That means more video, and more video means more backhaul. Some amount of usage can be offloaded to the fixed network, but video telephony won’t become mainstream until users can just use it, anytime they want.
By Gary KimLots of people will point out that person-to-person video calling appliances and features have been available for a while. Most of us would point to Skype, while others would point to the capabiltiies Nokia has been offering on its high-end phones, or the specialized video telephony products now on the market.
Apple’s new iPhone 4 “FaceTime” video calling feature might be notable, though. People will have different opinions about the ease of use for Skype video telephony, but the big snag for most consumer video telephony appliances has been the need to buy them in pairs.
The iPhone 4 might be the first “appliance” supporting video telephony that does not actually have to be “bought in pairs,” given the huge installed base the device is likely to have, globally. The other angle is that video telephony could become a “mere feature” of the most-widely-used communications appliance on the planet, though of course for the moment only on Apple iPhones from version 4 and forward.
Video calling might be a social function and therefore there is a network effect not possible when the units are deployed pair by pair.
Some significant sub-set of the mobile user population uses iPhones. In my own family, for example, all four of my children use iPhones, and it appears iPhone use among their peers is just about that high.
By confining FaceTime sessions to Wi-Fi connections, Apple avoids the almost-certain uneven quality of experience users would experience on AT&T’s 3G network.
Innovations sometimes, perhaps ever, solely or primarily dependent on development of new technology. More commonly, it is a combination of ease of use, user installed base, price and the face that lots of other people seem to be doing it. Up to this point, almost no users had to worry about “everybody else doing it.” That could change, beginning with the iPhone 4.
The bandwidth implications are clear enough. FaceTime only works when users are on a Wi-Fi (fixed line access) connection. That keeps the video bandwidth off the mobile network. Whether that stance can be maintained forever is questionable, though it also likely means service providers will be able to charge extra for the ability to use FaceTime on the mobile network.
Restricted to Wi-Fi, FaceTime is alot like Skype, a scheduled experience that does not represent unfettered, use it whenever you want communcations mobile text, texting and messaging represents. To make video telephony as natural as voice calling, FaceTime will have to be enabled for any-time mobile use.
Still, the direction is clear enough: The iPhone 4 supports high-definition video, pixel resolution that actually is higher than what the human eye can discriminate and is getting Netflix. That means more video, and more video means more backhaul. Some amount of usage can be offloaded to the fixed network, but video telephony won’t become mainstream until users can just use it, anytime they want.
By Gary Kim
Tags: Apple, backhaul, iPhone, video telephony
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, June 8th, 2010 at 11:44 am and is filed under EtherNEWS.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Potentially this throws up an application for video telephony or telephony via GPS. A GPS device can be used to transmit live images say of a person who waits in a GPS land station or even just outside his house.
Holy Smokes site owner you have got some wierd bugs on your web site about parse error unexpected T String in line 19
Can’t replicate the fault at the moment, perhaps it is fixed
liked this writing!
“what kind of plants do you have ? all i know is that should you get afeds then lady bugs will assist but i have never heard of mosquitoes or other bugs coming i simply because of plant you might want to try burning a citronella candle if it gets to bad”
Documents To Go let”s you transfer files to and from in iTunes and you can open files from email in it and etc. Not bad but a more global file manager would be better yes.When will fb fix the bug with the iPhone app not showing up under app settings in privacy settings. The app is useless for socializing at the moment with certain accounts.I have been getting this sine the 1st week I had atv. Unplugging and plugging in resolves it for a few weeks. When it comes back. Do it again. Has happened less since 4.2
The great news on African Mangoo revealed.
One thing I’ve noticed is always that there are plenty of fallacies regarding the banks intentions any time talking about foreclosures. One fantasy in particular is always that the bank wants your house. Your banker wants your money, not your house. They want the bucks they lent you along with interest. Preventing the bank will only draw any foreclosed final result. Thanks for your write-up.
Such an excellent description! No idea how you were able to write this text..it’d take me long hours. Well worth it though, I’d assume. Have you considered selling advertising space on your blog?