Archive for September, 2009

Who is Mzima?

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009
RSS Feed Subscribe to EtherNEWS Bookmark and Share

The future of telecom comes from stories like these: Mzima (pronounced M-zeema), an operator few of us know by name, now serving over 40 points of presence throughout North America, Western Europe and Asia with an all-packet transport network.  In the first six years since their inception in 2002 they grew under the radar, with almost no sales or marketing to speak of.  Despite this, they’ve signed on an impressive roster of customers – how’s eHarmony, and Facebook for web 2.0 heavyweights?

What makes Mzima a preferred choice over today’s wholesale giants?  It begins with the network.  While still virtually unknown, the engineering team was building out with the latest technology.  Today they operate a pure Ethernet network based on PBB-T that provides tangible benefits over MPLS: absolute transport transparency, low overhead, cost-efficient equipment.  With a pure layer 2 network, customers’ VLANs, MPLS tags, service classes and any IP applications run as if on a LAN – and when you’re dealing with content providers as key customers, simple interconnectivity that fits in with their model of distributed data centers, web-server farms and transactional processing can win you the business.

Mzima is a Swahili word that means stream, or alive, which was their first intention: to become a content delivery network for streaming video and all things media.  But once they got started, they quickly realized there was a far greater need: simple, high-performance Ethernet wholesale connectivity.  Over time Mzima has established settlement-free peering with major MSOs, ILECs and CLECs, and has created a reputation for highly reliable, ultra-low latency networking services just as likely to be used by financial traders as online retailers.  If settlement-free peering doesn’t make traditional providers think profitability, they might need to think again.  Single customers on Mzima’s network pay upwards of $1.5MUSD a month to interconnect their sites.

Being all-packet day-one has had its headaches as any early adopter will attest, but the end result is a network that showcases all the benefits of Carrier Ethernet.  Where some providers struggle with simple services like burstable bandwidth – since difficulty collecting usage stats makes billing impossible – Mzima’s uniform network is easy to maintain, and allows them to not only offer burst services, but even time-of-day bandwidth profiles for committed and excess information rates that fit the needs of content and location-based services.  Imagine doing this with a TDM-based core?  Of course it can be done, but at the price of bandwidth efficiency and operational complexity.

Going all-packet has its advantages, but doesn’t mean Mzima doesn’t face challenges.  Ironically, the same Ethernet-loving customers that helped them expand would love to see TDM connectivity as well.  Serving off-net customers with less capable peering partners can limit flexibility.  And many customers need to be taught the value a pure-packet network affords.  When you’re apples to oranges education is key, especially when your focus is more performance than price.

It’s certain that Mzima’s new evangelization phase will help to build awareness of the benefits of Ethernet transport.   It’s also certain that they’re sure to attract competition, as today’s legacy operators build out native Ethernet to capture business from the largest emerging data users of our time.  But I have to think that Mzima will hold its own.  In a way they speak the language of a new breed of customer, a language traditional carriers might have yet to learn.

You can learn more about the challenges, requirements and strategies to efficiently offer and use Ethernet wholesale in a short video at Accedian.com/wholesale.


RSS Feed Subscribe to EtherNEWS Bookmark and Share

Assurance Insurance

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009
RSS Feed Subscribe to EtherNEWS Bookmark and Share

VON 2009 Session Summary: Assurance Insurance: Making the Most of Service Assurance Investments

Panellists:

  • Grant Kirkwood, Founder and CTO, Mzima Networks
  • Matt Herdlein, Executive Director, Service Management Portfolio, Telcordia
  • Rick Schmaltz, Vice President Business Development, CA

Reflecting is not usually the way my day begins, unless I’m camping and waiting for coffee to boil.  I usually arrive at the office to a queue of emails and tasks, and usually the rest is a blur.  But it was a different kind of start yesterday morning at the VON Conference in Miami: our panel of three talented, industry thought leaders had plenty of insight on tap.  They squared up the state of affairs in Service Assurance (SA), and shared hard-won experience that make the most of substantial investments into service management, performance monitoring and back-office systems of all kinds.  By “substantial”, we’re talking millions, an ongoing expense providers pour into their platforms: sometimes just to keep their head above water, but increasingly to gain a strategic advantage over less organized operators.

So how does an operator monetize and maximize their investments in SA?  That’s what we set out to explore, and let me tell you, an hour is scant time for such a subject.  We covered the highlights and then some in double time, here is the wrap-up.

Making Money

Generating revenue is always a popular subject, and Matt Herdlein, executive director of Telcordia’s service management portfolio pointed out that monitoring quality of service (QoS) can lead to new value-added services.  By trending performance over a period of time, Herdlein explained, providers gain confidence in their ability to deliver premium, SLA-grade services.  Repeatable QoS data seems to be what some providers need to take the leap into a premium services portfolio.  Such services are known to deliver 25-60% more profit to a provider, depending on the level of commitment: ultra-low latency, jitter and high availability command a higher price than simple packet-loss and basic uptime assurances.  Grant Kirkwood, founder and CTO at Mzima, echoed this observation, adding that not only does SA let a provider discover their strengths and develop new products, trending data acts as a powerful track record that shows new customers you’ve got what it takes when courting their business.

Information is Everthing

Having data is good, but real-time reporting and finding the needle in the data-haystack is a key to SA delivering on its potential.  Rick Schmaltz, VP Business Development at CA, highlighted a subscription web support and data mining service offered by Verizon Business that let customers drill down into their network and application transmission data to perform ad-hoc reporting.  Since its introduction, significant uptake shows that enterprise IT departments are willing to pay extra for more information, using insight gained to optimize traffic flow, plan network and data center upgrades, and evaluate and maintain per-application QoS.

Having a real-time customer portal is a differentiator, but proceed with caution, says Kirkwood, since giving customers access to too much data can backfire.  He points out that each customer has their own view of what matters, so portals should reflect their needs.  So while you would report per-second latency performance to a financial firm, it may not make sense to highlight jitter performance as you would to a video-oriented customer.  Even data that shows you’re doing a great job might cause issues.  For example, if your SA portal shows rapid switchover to a protected route, a provider would be proud: it’s great to show your network stays up even with a fiber cut.  But to some customers, just knowing that protection was required is unsettling, and can even be misinterpreted as a service outage – even if not a single packet was lost.

Portals Save Cash

Although you have to publish with precision, Kirkwood is a firm believer in the customer portal, “The difference between two great providers is often reporting”.  A differentiator, but also a path to savings: customers who know what’s going on log fewer trouble tickets.  Since most WAN performance problems originate within the enterprise itself, helping IT staff isolate issues to within their own network can easily cut support costs in half.

If knowing what to report is important, knowing what data to collect from a myriad of network elements, operation support systems, monitoring platforms and databases is critical.  As service assurance platforms can be overwhelmed by data, Schmaltz says it’s key to determine up front what metrics are required from the different departments within the provider’s organization, then plan accordingly.

Focus on Integration

Another way to maximize SA investments is to get systems talking to each other.  Mzima went through a painful, multi-year, outsourced integration project that exposed the value of focus, “We had ten systems to integrate, and got nine out of ten done ten percent of the way,” said Kirkwood.  Now the focus is on one project at a time, at least 90% complete before further integration is planned.

Schmaltz agrees, “You can’t boil the ocean.  You need to stick with the high-revenue projects and deliver results.  Providers need to focus on ‘Time to Value’.”  Which project first?  Kirkwood says Mzima takes a cross-functional approach, where marketing, operations, support and finance review their needs each quarter, and projects are selected that provide tangible returns to the most departments.

While focused objectives are required in the short term, long-term commitment drives even further SA value.  Herdlein underlines that in the beginning, building an effective SA platform means getting the basics in place.  Building on this framework brings substantial benefits over time, and this is where SA vendors and integrators come into their own and bring out the synergy in the parts.

Getting our Bearings

So what’s the future of SA?  Herdlein says combining consolidated reporting with actionable response will be key as systems and networks grow in complexity.  Kirkwood sees a need for long-term trending tools to complement real-time reporting.  Schmaltz points out that all this has to happen from the application layer downward, focusing first on the customer experience, then drilling-down through the layers, replacing the network-centric view many operators work from today.

It’s certain that SA is evolving, bringing transparency and intelligence to operators and their customers.  Overall, there are many different avenues to making the most out of SA investments, most requiring patience, planning and ongoing effort.  Operators that follow this path report countless benefits; SA becomes a strategic advantage that creates revenue, streamlines operations and wins new business.


RSS Feed Subscribe to EtherNEWS Bookmark and Share

LTE: Push or Pull?

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009
RSS Feed Subscribe to EtherNEWS Bookmark and Share

An optimistic new study released this week by Coda Research paints a rosy picture for LTE growth worldwide.  The broad strokes are interesting reading: Europe will be first out of the gate, and will remain a leader in deploying and monetizing LTE wireless broadband until Asian subscribers gain critical mass in 2016.  North America bodes well too, with seven million LTE users by 2013, amounting to over 70% of mobile broadband revenue state-side.

Since 2013 is far away, especially while waiting for the global economy to recover, it’s hard to imagine analysts taking a stab at concrete numbers for a technology that has yet to be deployed beyond a few demo sites.  However, Coda claims to have a unique research method where, “Following rigorous in-depth research and as much thinking as necessary, we provide thorough accounts that contain in-depth and detailed implications.”

It may be hard to quantify what “as much thinking as necessary”, means, but aside from results that would make any equipment maker proud, I see some points that might need a bit more polishing.  One is the recent statement by Vodaphone’s R&D Director, Michal Walker, that “no European LTE networks will be up and running… before 2012.”  Working for the largest provider planning LTE in Europe he must be well informed, but Coda estimates revenue growth of 47% CAGR through 2012 (47% of 0?), and 10 million users happily high-speed surfing the same year.

So how did these numbers get built up?  The underlying assumption (“of particular note”) is that user behavior, accessing media-rich data will drive the need for LTE from 2012 to 2017 (imagine, forecasting 8 years out!): video will see a CAGR of 93%, audio 79%, internet 78%, and P2P 77%.  So it seems that the way we use our mobile devices is going to create a massive demand for bandwidth.  We’ll be pulling the providers by their ears to get LTE in our backyard.  But is that really the history of mobile?  Was 3G demanded by consumers or dropped on them by providers looking for new revenue streams as voice rates plummeted?

Personally, I think the providers will roll out LTE when they’re good and ready: once they’ve recovered enough revenue from their 3G deployments, once the economy is in full swing, and once something more disruptive than watching YouTube on the bus (for 150$/month, according to Coda’s ARPU estimates) comes along.  Oh, and once they figure out how to deploy it (see the 3D, 4G Mesh, and LTE Backhaul, Think Twice)

Until then, let’s enjoy the fantastic growth of 3G, and all the innovation and network transformation that this here-and-now technology is carrying with it: ubiquitous Ethernet backhaul and wholesale, an economy of scale for packet-based, carrier-grade networking gear that will fuel development of the networks to come.  (see 3G: Ethernet’s Big Break).


RSS Feed Subscribe to EtherNEWS Bookmark and Share